Inmo Air 3 vs Rokid Smart Glasses: Can AR Eyewear Replace Your Smartphone?

The Rise of AR Smart Glasses

Tom Walker

Augmented Reality (AR) smart glasses are no longer a futuristic concept—they are here, reshaping how we interact with technology. From real-time navigation overlays to hands-free photography, these devices blend the digital world with our physical environment. The market is growing rapidly, with devices like the Inmo Air 3 and Rokid Smart Glasses at the forefront of innovation.

AR smart glasses offer a potential shift in how we consume information, communicate, and manage daily tasks. But can they truly replace smartphones, or are they complementary devices? This detailed comparison examines every angle—design, display, performance, camera, usability, battery life, accessibility, and features—helping readers decide which AR device aligns with their needs.

Key Takeaways: Inmo Air 3 vs Rokid Smart Glasses

Before diving deeper, here’s a quick overview of key differences:

Design: Rokid is lightweight (49g) and ergonomic, while Inmo Air 3 is heavier (135g), making extended use less comfortable.
Display: Rokid prioritizes outdoor visibility with 1,500 nits brightness, while Inmo Air 3 offers a wider 36° field of view but struggles under sunlight.
Camera: Rokid delivers 12MP 1680p video with excellent low-light performance; Inmo Air 3 has a 16MP 1080p camera but inconsistent quality.
Usability: Rokid offers intuitive touch and voice controls; Inmo Air 3 uses a touch remote or ring interface.
Battery Life: Rokid provides longer operational time, while Inmo Air 3 can last only 1.5 hours under heavy use.
Accessibility: Rokid supports prescriptions from -16 to +16 diopters, significantly better than Inmo Air 3’s -4 to +4 diopters.

Design and Build Quality

The ergonomics of AR smart glasses determine their wearability.

Rokid Smart Glasses

Weighing just 49 grams, Rokid emphasizes comfort for prolonged use.
Minimalist design with optional sunshade for outdoor use.
Ideal for users who value portability and extended sessions without discomfort.

Inmo Air 3

Heavier at 135 grams, which may cause fatigue during extended wear.
Bulkier design can feel less natural for daily use.
Offers higher durability but compromises comfort.

Conclusion: For long-term usability and comfort, Rokid Smart Glasses have a clear advantage.

Display Technology and Visual Experience

The display determines how effectively AR content is viewed in different environments.

Rokid

Monochrome green HUD at 640x480p, 23° field of view.
Exceptional brightness at 1,500 nits, perfect for outdoor visibility.
Focused on clarity over resolution.

Inmo Air 3

Full-color 1080p display with 36° field of view.
Brightness limited to 600 nits, making outdoor visibility challenging.
Broader field enhances immersive experiences but struggles in sunlight.

Takeaway: Rokid prioritizes functionality in varied environments, while Inmo Air 3 aims for a more cinematic visual experience.

Processing Power and RAM

Performance impacts multitasking and device responsiveness.

Rokid

Snapdragon AR1 processor with 2GB RAM.
Optimized for AR-specific tasks, low latency, and smooth operation.

Inmo Air 3

Snapdragon 8-core processor with 8GB RAM.
Supports Android OS with full multitasking capabilities.
More versatile but less efficient in resource management.

Verdict: Rokid offers a smoother AR experience for dedicated tasks, while Inmo Air 3 provides raw power for app flexibility.

Camera Capabilities

Cameras are critical for AR content capture and interactive applications.

Rokid

12MP camera with 1680p video, 109° field of view.
Advanced HDR for low-light environments.
Reliable image clarity across conditions.

Inmo Air 3

16MP camera with 1080p video, 120° field of view.
Wider angle but issues with distortion and poor low-light performance.

Recommendation: Rokid’s camera is more consistent for practical use, especially in AR tasks requiring precise visuals.

Control and Usability

Ease of interaction determines the practical value of AR glasses.

Rokid

Touch-sensitive interface with voice command integration.
Supports live translation, navigation, and productivity tools.
Designed for intuitive and seamless AR operation.

Inmo Air 3

Touch remote or ring interface mimics smartphone interaction.
Less efficient and can slow down multitasking.
Android flexibility adds complexity.

Conclusion: Rokid provides superior usability for everyday AR functionality.

Applications and Features

Rokid Smart Glasses

Built-in AI capabilities including live translation (89 languages).
Offline teleprompter mode.
Integration with Google Maps and accessibility features.

Inmo Air 3

Android 14 OS with Google Play Store access.
App versatility allows web browsing and document editing.
Less focused on AR-specific tasks.

Insight: Rokid is optimized for AR and real-time tasks, while Inmo Air 3 is a general-purpose smart device.

Prescription and Accessibility

Rokid

Prescription support: -16 to +16 diopters.
Inclusive design with accessibility tools for visually/hearing-impaired users.

Inmo Air 3

Prescription support: -4 to +4 diopters.
Limited accessibility features.

Conclusion: Rokid accommodates a broader audience and is better for users with stronger prescriptions.

Battery Life and Performance

Battery endurance impacts the practical deployment of smart glasses.

Rokid

Adjustable brightness settings for extended use.
Stable performance over longer sessions.

Inmo Air 3

Approximately 1.5 hours under intensive use.
Overheating reported during prolonged sessions.

Winner: Rokid ensures longer usability without interruptions.

Customer Support and Updates

Reliable customer support is essential for emerging technologies.

Rokid: Responsive service, regular updates, active user feedback integration.
Inmo Air 3: Criticism for delayed support and poor response handling.

Recommendation: Rokid offers a more dependable ownership experience.

Real-World Use Cases

Rokid Smart Glasses

Business and enterprise: hands-free productivity, live translations, and data overlays.
Travel and navigation: AR maps and offline teleprompter.
Accessibility: enhanced usability for users with visual or hearing limitations.

Inmo Air 3

Android users: app versatility for browsing, document editing, and multimedia.
Less optimized for dedicated AR experiences.

Comparative Summary Table

Feature	Rokid Smart Glasses	Inmo Air 3
Weight	49g	135g
Display	640x480p, 1,500 nits, 23° FOV	1080p, 600 nits, 36° FOV
Camera	12MP, 1680p, HDR	16MP, 1080p, some distortion
OS	Custom AR OS	Android 14
Controls	Touch & Voice	Touch Remote/Ring
Battery	Extended, stable	1.5 hours, overheating
Prescription	-16 to +16 D	-4 to +4 D
Accessibility	Extensive	Limited
Customer Support	Strong	Limited

Final Verdict

Rokid Smart Glasses: Ideal for AR-focused users, prioritizing comfort, usability, and accessibility.
Inmo Air 3: Suited for Android enthusiasts who value app versatility but can compromise on AR practicality.

For most users seeking a reliable, user-friendly AR experience, Rokid emerges as the superior choice.

Related Guides for AR Enthusiasts

References

Sullivan, S. (2025). AR Smart Glasses Comparison: Inmo Air 3 vs Rokid. Geeky Gadgets.
TechRadar. (2025). The Best AR Glasses for Enterprise and Consumer Use.
IEEE Access. (2024). Augmented Reality in Wearables: Trends and Applications.